Jacob Jensen allierte seg med møbelsnekkerne på B&O, og insisterte på at kveliteten ville ligge i valget av treverk og behandlingen av samme, så det er noen vakre ting.
Jeg tror det er omvendt - at sen-versjonen av S45 hadde tilsvarende oppbygging. Men den aller første hadde kun 2 elementer - og det var bruken av 3 i S45-2 som gjorde utslaget lydmessig, og som har gitt denne ry som den beste "bookend" passive høyttaleren til B&O.
Ja, det var en overgangsfase mellom 1. gen og S45-2 der man fortsatte å bruke samme tweeter som i 1. Gen.
1. generasjon S45 har heltre edeltrekabinett, mens S45-2 har edeltre finér, samme for siste generasjon S45.
WWDT
(Litt info:
So the shiny black domes are polycarbonate/mylar material, Philips model AD 0162/T8 and come in shiny black or clear dome and seem to share the same model number between the two variants. The matt black ones are AD 0163/T8 and are a soft fabric dome and used in later production s45-2 and are also similar to those which were in my S55's. The main difference between the two is the material used for the dome and the resonant frequency 1000hz vs 1300hz.I did have (and recently sold) another pair of s45-2 with the soft fabric domes, their high end was similar to pair 2 and unless I demo'd them beside pair 1, they always sounded nice but seemed to be missing something compared to pair 1. So this got me thinking, my issue might be with the tweeter itself.Yesterday I spoke to a guy I know who repairs speakers and turntables in Melbourne, he told me his belief is that the earlier model polycarbonate dome tweeters are a better sounding tweeter than the fabric dome (just his opinion). Note: to look at them whilst mounted in the cabinet, the construction and physical appearance of the tweeters is almost identical except for the appearance of the dome.)
1. generasjon S45
Vis vedlegget 209960
