Diverse Den store flytråden

Diskusjonstråd Se tråd i gallerivisning

  • Hardingfele

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    25.10.2014
    Innlegg
    22.747
    Antall liker
    15.929
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Dette ser ganske ekstremt ut, men jeg er redd det er langt fra det eneste tilfellet.
    Hele ledelsen i Boeing burde få noen tiår i fengsel. Det selskapet ble styrt av idioter, som kom til at ingeniører er altfor vanskelige, vekk med dem.
    Flyene er farlige.
     

    xerxes

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    08.01.2005
    Innlegg
    9.935
    Antall liker
    5.614
    Sted
    Holmestrand
    Ganske utrolig å komme seg hjem i de restene der ... Image 05-04-2024 at 20.46.jpg
    Fra reddit, hvor det er 2 kommentarer til bildet, den første er vel mest sannsynlig?
    "Looks like a mid-air collision. Cannon and machine gun fire leaves holes, not dents.

    Edit: after doing some research, I am pretty much convinced this is not actually Alton Frazer's Corsair, but another aircraft from VMF-113 that was damaged in a ground collision.

    The list of FG Corsair USN Accidents lists a VF-113 Corsair number 88441, flown by 1st Lt. Russell Hunchar, that was involved in a ground collision by aircraft 88399. Notice that the aircraft in the picture has 441 on its cowl.

    The collision occurred on 4 July 1945, two weeks after the dogfight in OP's post.

    For what it's worth, Lt. Hunchar was also involved in the dogfight in which Lt. Fraser's airplane was damaged.

    This same photo appears in the book Genda's Blade which recounts the dogfight. The photo is credited to Olga Hunchar.


    As I mentioned, the type of damage on the aircraft in the picture doesn't look like cannon fire, but does look like what would happen if a parked aircraft were hit by another moving Corsair - as happened to 88441 on 4 July. The slash near the canopy is at the height where a wingtip would be, and the damage to the left wing was probably caused by the propeller."


    "It is a combat damage, it happened on June 22nd, 1945 in engagement over Amami Oshima where about 20 Corsairs from VMF-113, led by Major Orvin H. Ramlo carried a standard CAP barrier preventing any aircraft from flying to Okinawa. Among them was 2nd Lt. Alson C. Frazer flying a top cover in his FG-1D. VFM-113 was engaged by a group of less than 30 Shiden-Kais from 343rd Kokutai under command of Lt. Oshibuchi.


    Section in which was Alson Frazer got attacked form above by 7 N1K2-Js of 301st Squadron, during combat Corsair division broke into 1 vs 1 or 2 vs 1 dogfights. Frazer tried to rejoin his leader 1/Lt Johnson, but suddenly a George came into view on his right, flying to the left and Frazer managed to score a victory with a carefully led deflection shot. George canopy shattered and a large chunk of metal flew off the right wing root. Most likely Frazer hit Lt Keijiro Hayashi aircraft who was leading Japanese 1st division of the 2nd Chutai. Hayashi disengaged and hid in clouds, but as the aircraft was trailing a white smoke and way to Kyushu was long he never made it and was posted missing.

    Here is how Frazer recalls the moment after scoring hits, when he realized that someone also got him in his sights:

    “I began to notice that my left wing was disintegrating. I heard no shots, I heard no gunfire. But became visually aware that my left wing was coming apart. So I realized that i had been hit, so I broke off my left turn and rolled out and pitched over and commenced to dive. I remember being quite frightened. My adrenaline was undoubtedly very high but my mental capacities were good. I just felt that I’ve been hit, OK, he won, I lost, now let’s go home!”

    Frazer was briefly followed by a Shiden-Kai which kept shooting, but eventually in clouds disengaged. Frazer left the dogfight and landed safely in his damaged machine.

    But not everyone was so lucky that day as 343rd Kokutai returned to its home missing four pilots (Lt Keijiro Hayashi, CPOs Sueo Ishizue and Takashi Yanagisawa and PO 1/c Susumu Tsuchiya) while VMF-113 lost 2 pilots and 2 machines with three other damaged.

    Unit’s post action report was following:

    “The enemy planes and pilots engaged were by no means of the type usually encountered. Their planes were good and the pilots skilled and aggressive. A very good formation was flown and maintained. Deception was used by sending in one division as decoy. The planes waiting above were grouped in four-plane divisions, sections roughly abreast, and divisions stacked. They attacked by divisions in the following manner: The whole division executed a chandelle to the left, thus starting a diving approach on opposite course with altitude advantage. The division then split into two sections, one going to each side of the target planes and executed high side runs simultaneously, completing the run by tailing in and joining."


    Following day marked also end of organized resistance on Okinawa."
     
    Sist redigert:

    Spiralis

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    13.03.2005
    Innlegg
    19.562
    Antall liker
    7.890
    Torget vurderinger
    0
    Og da oppsto begrepet: "On a wing and a prayer."

    Og som det ofte sies etter et slagsmål: "Skulle gjerne sett hvordan han andre så ut!"
     

    otare

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    04.04.2007
    Innlegg
    13.796
    Antall liker
    9.459
    Sted
    Trondheim
    Det var vel det siste (eneste) flyet med stempelmotor som skjøt ned et jetfly?

    BTW: Måkevingene hadde det fordi propellen var så stor at den ville tatt nedi hvis flyet hadde "normale" vinger. Med "normale" vinger ville understellet bli så langt at det ville blitt for svakt (har jeg lest et eller annet sted).
    Det tøffeste jagerflyet fra 2. VK.
     

    Halair

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    10.10.2014
    Innlegg
    1.618
    Antall liker
    1.746
    Sted
    Sandefjord
    ....Måkevingene hadde det fordi propellen var så stor at den ville tatt nedi hvis flyet hadde "normale" vinger....
    For å kunneta ut Hk-effekten fra motoren måte store skovler til, hvert propellblad er ca 190cm i lengde = 4m i propellomkrets... o_O
     

    Spiralis

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    13.03.2005
    Innlegg
    19.562
    Antall liker
    7.890
    Torget vurderinger
    0
    Det var vel det siste (eneste) flyet med stempelmotor som skjøt ned et jetfly?

    BTW: Måkevingene hadde det fordi propellen var så stor at den ville tatt nedi hvis flyet hadde "normale" vinger. Med "normale" vinger ville understellet bli så langt at det ville blitt for svakt (har jeg lest et eller annet sted).
    Det tøffeste jagerflyet fra 2. VK.
    Mener at også Mustanger skjøt ned jetfly i Korea. Under WWII var det flere stempelmotorfly som "parkerte" jetfly. I allefall i henhold til Clostermanns bok.
     

    erato

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    15.03.2003
    Innlegg
    19.584
    Antall liker
    9.778
    Sted
    Bergen
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    For å kunneta ut Hk-effekten fra motoren måte store skovler til, hvert propellblad er ca 190cm i lengde = 4m i propellomkrets... o_O
    Og dreiemomentet var en virkelig killer ved avgang som tok livet av uerfarne piloter som ga på for mye.
     

    Valentino

    JB rünnhilde
    Ble medlem
    23.04.2008
    Innlegg
    28.990
    Antall liker
    22.139
    Sted
    Ottestad
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Hawker Tempest V (Clostermann fløy slike i 45) hadde 4,3 m propelldiameter og var også notorisk vanskelig ved takeoff. Den hadde ikke måkevinger, men så var den da heller ikke laget for hangarskipslandinger.
     

    Asbjørn

    Rubinmedlem
    Ble medlem
    26.03.2006
    Innlegg
    36.707
    Antall liker
    35.698
    Sted
    Vingulmǫrk
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Mener at også Mustanger skjøt ned jetfly i Korea. Under WWII var det flere stempelmotorfly som "parkerte" jetfly. I allefall i henhold til Clostermanns bok.
    Det stemmer nok. Det var ikke så mye annet enn propellfly vs Me-262. Metoden var å forsøke å overraske dem på vei inn mot landing.

    Har ikke sett noe om at en Mustang greide å vinne over MiG-15, men en Sea Fury greide det også. Generelt var MiG-15 nokså jevnbyrdig med F-86 Sabre. Ifølge Wikipedia ble 28 F-51 Mustang meldt skutt ned av sovjetiske MiG-15. Å skyte ned en med et propellfly må nok gå på kontoen for ren flaks.

    1712473284602.png
     
    Sist redigert:

    SAL

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    05.10.2006
    Innlegg
    3.495
    Antall liker
    4.368
    Torget vurderinger
    10
    Ganske utrolig å komme seg hjem i de restene der ... Vis vedlegget 1012827
    Fra reddit, hvor det er 2 kommentarer til bildet, den første er vel mest sannsynlig?
    "Looks like a mid-air collision. Cannon and machine gun fire leaves holes, not dents.

    Edit: after doing some research, I am pretty much convinced this is not actually Alton Frazer's Corsair, but another aircraft from VMF-113 that was damaged in a ground collision.

    The list of FG Corsair USN Accidents lists a VF-113 Corsair number 88441, flown by 1st Lt. Russell Hunchar, that was involved in a ground collision by aircraft 88399. Notice that the aircraft in the picture has 441 on its cowl.

    The collision occurred on 4 July 1945, two weeks after the dogfight in OP's post.

    For what it's worth, Lt. Hunchar was also involved in the dogfight in which Lt. Fraser's airplane was damaged.

    This same photo appears in the book Genda's Blade which recounts the dogfight. The photo is credited to Olga Hunchar.


    As I mentioned, the type of damage on the aircraft in the picture doesn't look like cannon fire, but does look like what would happen if a parked aircraft were hit by another moving Corsair - as happened to 88441 on 4 July. The slash near the canopy is at the height where a wingtip would be, and the damage to the left wing was probably caused by the propeller."


    "It is a combat damage, it happened on June 22nd, 1945 in engagement over Amami Oshima where about 20 Corsairs from VMF-113, led by Major Orvin H. Ramlo carried a standard CAP barrier preventing any aircraft from flying to Okinawa. Among them was 2nd Lt. Alson C. Frazer flying a top cover in his FG-1D. VFM-113 was engaged by a group of less than 30 Shiden-Kais from 343rd Kokutai under command of Lt. Oshibuchi.


    Section in which was Alson Frazer got attacked form above by 7 N1K2-Js of 301st Squadron, during combat Corsair division broke into 1 vs 1 or 2 vs 1 dogfights. Frazer tried to rejoin his leader 1/Lt Johnson, but suddenly a George came into view on his right, flying to the left and Frazer managed to score a victory with a carefully led deflection shot. George canopy shattered and a large chunk of metal flew off the right wing root. Most likely Frazer hit Lt Keijiro Hayashi aircraft who was leading Japanese 1st division of the 2nd Chutai. Hayashi disengaged and hid in clouds, but as the aircraft was trailing a white smoke and way to Kyushu was long he never made it and was posted missing.

    Here is how Frazer recalls the moment after scoring hits, when he realized that someone also got him in his sights:

    “I began to notice that my left wing was disintegrating. I heard no shots, I heard no gunfire. But became visually aware that my left wing was coming apart. So I realized that i had been hit, so I broke off my left turn and rolled out and pitched over and commenced to dive. I remember being quite frightened. My adrenaline was undoubtedly very high but my mental capacities were good. I just felt that I’ve been hit, OK, he won, I lost, now let’s go home!”

    Frazer was briefly followed by a Shiden-Kai which kept shooting, but eventually in clouds disengaged. Frazer left the dogfight and landed safely in his damaged machine.

    But not everyone was so lucky that day as 343rd Kokutai returned to its home missing four pilots (Lt Keijiro Hayashi, CPOs Sueo Ishizue and Takashi Yanagisawa and PO 1/c Susumu Tsuchiya) while VMF-113 lost 2 pilots and 2 machines with three other damaged.

    Unit’s post action report was following:

    “The enemy planes and pilots engaged were by no means of the type usually encountered. Their planes were good and the pilots skilled and aggressive. A very good formation was flown and maintained. Deception was used by sending in one division as decoy. The planes waiting above were grouped in four-plane divisions, sections roughly abreast, and divisions stacked. They attacked by divisions in the following manner: The whole division executed a chandelle to the left, thus starting a diving approach on opposite course with altitude advantage. The division then split into two sections, one going to each side of the target planes and executed high side runs simultaneously, completing the run by tailing in and joining."


    Following day marked also end of organized resistance on Okinawa."
    Den ble skadet på bakken dessverre....., men hadde vært heftig om historien om luftkamp stemte.

    Mvh.
    SAL
     

    Hardingfele

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    25.10.2014
    Innlegg
    22.747
    Antall liker
    15.929
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    On Wednesday, another whistleblower, Boeing engineer Sam Salehpour, alleged the company took shortcuts in its production of 787 and 777 jets and, as a result, the planes have serious structural flaws.

    "I literally saw people jumping on the pieces of the airplane to get them to align, basically by jumping up and down your deforming parts so that the holes align temporarily and you can hit a piece with a mallet so that you can go into the hole. And that's not how you build an airplane," Salehpour told reporters.

     

    Valentino

    JB rünnhilde
    Ble medlem
    23.04.2008
    Innlegg
    28.990
    Antall liker
    22.139
    Sted
    Ottestad
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Hvorfor kamuflasjemale et kampfly symmetrisk? Noen som vet hvorfor det kan ha noe for seg?
     

    Spiralis

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    13.03.2005
    Innlegg
    19.562
    Antall liker
    7.890
    Torget vurderinger
    0
    Det er flere "skoler" når det gjelder dette med kamuflasje av fly. Og likeledes har det vært forsøkt mange rare løsninger. Men i dag er det som gjelder at kamuflasje
    i utgangspunktet er der for å kunne "gjemme" flyet når det står på bakken. I lufta er det så mange sensorer som kan avsløre flyets tilstedeværelse, og misiler blir ofte avfyrt før man ser det fiendtlige flyet med øynene. Fly som i utgangspunktet skal fly høyt er ofte gråfargede eller svarte slik at de ikke skal stikke seg ut i forhold til luften over dem. Høyt oppe er himmelen svart. Fly på hangarskip er ofte ikke kamuflert da dette er brotkastet. Vanskelig å få et svært hangarskip til å
    forsvinne! Men til ditt direkte spørsmål tror jeg at dette er et "Peacetime" mønster og at det vil endre seg ganske fort den dagen Putin banker på døra.
     

    Valentino

    JB rünnhilde
    Ble medlem
    23.04.2008
    Innlegg
    28.990
    Antall liker
    22.139
    Sted
    Ottestad
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    En sak jeg ser er at den forsøker å se ut som noe annet enn en Gripen.
     

    Asbjørn

    Rubinmedlem
    Ble medlem
    26.03.2006
    Innlegg
    36.707
    Antall liker
    35.698
    Sted
    Vingulmǫrk
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Det er en form for «splinter camouflage». Formålet er å bryte opp den visuelle silhuetten og forsinke gjenkjenning. Svenskene har brukt varianter av det i mange år, basert på/inspirert av tysk Splittertarn. Hvorfor det er symmetrisk på Gripen vet jeg ikke.
     
    Sist redigert:

    Halair

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    10.10.2014
    Innlegg
    1.618
    Antall liker
    1.746
    Sted
    Sandefjord
    Apropos Spitfire, det er en på vei til Norge as we speak... 😍
    Nybygd, på vei over fra Biggin Hill, 2-seters som skal ha sin hjembase på Notodden.
    (Jeg har ingen økonomiske interesser i dette prosjektet, men kjenner til (via-via) noen av de bak prosjektet da jeg selv flyr på Notodden (seilfly))

    Skal om været tillater det via DK til SVE før siste leg til Norge.
    Kjennetegn LN-AOA
     
    Sist redigert:

    Halair

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    10.10.2014
    Innlegg
    1.618
    Antall liker
    1.746
    Sted
    Sandefjord
    Nybygd??? o_O Da er det noen kraftige pengegubber i bakhanda....
    Kostbart prosjekt, det er helt sikkert - har hørt noen tall...

    "April 9th 2024 - After nine year of restoration our two seater Spitfire EN 570 with Norwegian call sign LN-AOA have received airworthiness certificate. Huge thank to the Norwegian CAA for handling the certification process in such professional maner. First flight expected from Biggin Hill this week where it flew it last mission with 611 sq. 81 year ago. From next month is would be possible to fly in this Spitfire out of Notodden, Norway. RNoAF war hero Rolf Thorbjørn Tradin flew this Spitfire out of Biggin Hill during the war. Picture from Biggin Hill last week with NCAA and our team in front of the Spitfire"

    AOA.jpg

    Herremannen i lys skjorte er Rolf Meum, som er pilot for turen hjem til Norge, trolig ankomst Notodden nå i dag 10.mai da været ser ok ut 😍
     

    xerxes

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    08.01.2005
    Innlegg
    9.935
    Antall liker
    5.614
    Sted
    Holmestrand
    Ikke meg heller dessverre, billettprisen til tross er nok ikke dekningssgraden noe å skryte av 😅
    R
    hvor lenge varer en tur? Kan jo være en ok pris dersom varigheten er en stund og det er litt spenstig flyving.
    Kjenner jeg fikk lyst..
    Alt I alt så er det nok ikke dyrt, men jeg har ikke råd ... :cool:

    Hørt snakk om forsikring på en slik maskin koster rundt 500 store.
    "The Pilots handbook for the early model spitfires says minimum fuel burn is 30 Imperial gallons per hour, and maximum is 120 gallons per hour"
    £50K PER YEAR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. Looking after the undercarriage, propeller, wiring, hinges, key stress points and so on is of course hugely expensive, certainly compared to a road car. Remember that a Mk IX Spitfire was designed for a total flying life of just 200 hours.
    Den skal ha maskinverhaling etter 500 timer, det koster 1,5 mill...

    Så jeg tror IKKE det er vanskelig å forsvare prisen, nei.
     

    Halair

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    10.10.2014
    Innlegg
    1.618
    Antall liker
    1.746
    Sted
    Sandefjord
    Turene som kan bookes via har 20min flytid og varer ca 30min totalt med taxetid etc + film av turen.
    Har man mer penger til slik morro kan nok lengre tur avtales...

    Minne for livet ganske sikkert... 😅
     

    xerxes

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    08.01.2005
    Innlegg
    9.935
    Antall liker
    5.614
    Sted
    Holmestrand
    Her er litt å tenke på før du bestiller en spitfire ...
    .
     
  • Laster inn…

Diskusjonstråd Se tråd i gallerivisning

  • Laster inn…
Topp Bunn