P
Parelius
Gjest
Lang posting om MM PU-er, av en som tydeligvis har prøvd ut en del.
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1200430667&read&3&4&
En sitter sånn umiddelbart igjen med det inntrykket at intet slår gode MM PU-er når det gjelder pris/ytelsesforhold, og at gode MM ikke står i skyggen av de store MC.
Liste over det ypperste i MM:
Audio Technica ATML 170 and 180 OCC, Grado The Amber Tribute, Grace Ruby, Garrot P77, Nagaoka MP-50 Super, B&O MMC2 and MMC20CL, AKG P8ES SuperNova, Reson Reca ,Astatic MF-100 and Stanton LZS 981.
En annen ting som var litt interessant, og som jeg ikke har vært borti før; lasten på MM PU-ene:
we have to load the MM cartridges not at 47K but at 100K ( at least 75K not less. ).
I find that using 47K ( a standard manufacture recommendation ) prevent to obtain the best quality performance, 100K make the difference. I try this with all those MM type cartridges and in all of them I achieve the best performance with 100K load impedance.
I find too that using the manufacturer capacitance advise not always is for the better, till the end of the day I find that between 100-150pf ( total capacitance including cable capacitance. ) all the cartridges performs at its best.
I start to change the load impedance on MM cartridges like a synonymous that what many of us made with MC cartridges where we try with different load impedance values, latter I read on the Empire 4000 DIII that the precise load impedance must be 100kOhms and in a white paper of some Grace F9 tests the used impedance value was 100kOhms, the same that I read on other operational MM cartridge manual and my ears tell/told me that 100kOhms is the value .
Andre punkter; arm/PU/shell kombo viktigere enn drivverket.
Noen som har liknende erfaringer?
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1200430667&read&3&4&
En sitter sånn umiddelbart igjen med det inntrykket at intet slår gode MM PU-er når det gjelder pris/ytelsesforhold, og at gode MM ikke står i skyggen av de store MC.
Liste over det ypperste i MM:
Audio Technica ATML 170 and 180 OCC, Grado The Amber Tribute, Grace Ruby, Garrot P77, Nagaoka MP-50 Super, B&O MMC2 and MMC20CL, AKG P8ES SuperNova, Reson Reca ,Astatic MF-100 and Stanton LZS 981.
En annen ting som var litt interessant, og som jeg ikke har vært borti før; lasten på MM PU-ene:
we have to load the MM cartridges not at 47K but at 100K ( at least 75K not less. ).
I find that using 47K ( a standard manufacture recommendation ) prevent to obtain the best quality performance, 100K make the difference. I try this with all those MM type cartridges and in all of them I achieve the best performance with 100K load impedance.
I find too that using the manufacturer capacitance advise not always is for the better, till the end of the day I find that between 100-150pf ( total capacitance including cable capacitance. ) all the cartridges performs at its best.
I start to change the load impedance on MM cartridges like a synonymous that what many of us made with MC cartridges where we try with different load impedance values, latter I read on the Empire 4000 DIII that the precise load impedance must be 100kOhms and in a white paper of some Grace F9 tests the used impedance value was 100kOhms, the same that I read on other operational MM cartridge manual and my ears tell/told me that 100kOhms is the value .
Andre punkter; arm/PU/shell kombo viktigere enn drivverket.
Noen som har liknende erfaringer?
