Politikk, religion og samfunn President Donald J. Trump - Quo vadis? (Del 1)

Diskusjonstråd Se tråd i gallerivisning

  • Status
    Stengt for ytterligere svar.
    G

    Gjestemedlem

    Gjest
    Samt å framstille disse bildene som vakre.
    Da har du et sykt, sykt sinn.

    Disqutabel

    Det vakre for meg er ikke motivsjonafremmende memes på nettet, men historiske bilder fra virkeligheten. Jeg liker ikke å se død og elendighet, men noen fotografier er udødelige. De to her er eksempler på det, men det er helt sikkert mange nye røde som foretrekker å gå i gråtemodus og krølle seg ned i en krok for å unngå virkeligheten.

    Det vakre er ikke bare glansbilder og gråtekomunisme:

     

    Disqutabel

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    28.09.2016
    Innlegg
    11.731
    Antall liker
    11.814
    ^

    Situasjon 1: Daglig teppebombing med bl.a. napalm. Ingen trygghet, usikker mattilgang, vanskelig å bruke naturen grunnet personellminer og blindgjengere. Lovløse tilstander.

    Situasjon 2: Kommunisme av gammelt merke, svært liten egen frihet, ettpartistat, man har mat og stort sett fredlige omgivelser. Dessuten flott natur og en del turister som kommer på besøk.

    Vi velger situasjon 1, for vi liker ikke "identitetspolitikk", nemlig.

    Jadda.

    Disqutabel
     

    erato

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    15.03.2003
    Innlegg
    20.177
    Antall liker
    10.930
    Sted
    Bergen
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    There is no society Gjestemedlem? Jeg er stygt redd for at det er nettopp den ekstreme fokus på individet som kjennetegner den du vet. Allemennesker har en identitet som i noen grad definerer hvem de er. Å leve sammen dreier seg om balansen mellom det individuelle og det kollektive. Og ja; det er mye fjolleri i identitetspolitikken, akkurat som i den ekstreme individualismen.
     
    G

    Gjestemedlem

    Gjest
    Min største innsigelse mot identitetspolitikken er at det handler om å snylte på andre mennesker og hva de har gjort eller måtte lide seg i gjennom. Vi ale har jo en tilhørighet, familie, slekt, venner og annet. Norge som nasjonalstat er basert på en homogen befolkning.

    De rødgrønne søker å rasere dette med å importere titusenvis av araberkulturelle snyltere. Det må jo, og går jo, til helvete. Se til Sverige.

    Staten bør holde seg til å besørge skole, helse, infrastruktur, politi, forsvar og helsevesen. Utover det skal politikerne kunne ikke stjele folks penger for å spy dem ut over alle deres gode formål.
     

    defacto

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    04.05.2016
    Innlegg
    5.777
    Antall liker
    3.212
    Sted
    Liten by
    Jeg er takknemlig for to ting, jeg bor ikke i Bergen og haterene er ikke i flertall...enda.
     

    erato

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    15.03.2003
    Innlegg
    20.177
    Antall liker
    10.930
    Sted
    Bergen
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Ikke noe galt med Bergen sier jeg, som bodd lenge både der, i Oslo og i Trondheim. Samt på en håndfull andre steder. Askøy, tja....
     

    Hardingfele

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    25.10.2014
    Innlegg
    24.295
    Antall liker
    18.694
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Trump er ikke det "very stable genius" han innbiller seg at han er. Fordi han ikke klarer å styre kjeften presterer han å lage store problemer for seg selv (for ikke å si resten av verden). Alt handler om ham og hva han mener er viktig der og da.

    Dermed oppstår underlige situasjoner, som denne: han anklager nå NBCs Lester Holt for å ha endret videointervjuet han gjorde tidligere i år, da han innrømmet at han sparket Comey pga Russlandetterforskningen. Det har gått opp for Trump at Mueller kan bruke dette for å tvinge Trump til å stille til utspørring. Trumps løsning er å prøve å påstå at NBC lyver, til tross for at Trump selv var meget fornøyd med sin innsats i intervjuet dengang. NBC har svart ved å legge ut hele opptaket:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-new...-holt-at-the-white-house-941854787582?v=raila


    Her er noen av Trumps løgner i dag:

    Skjermbilde 2018-08-30 kl. 17.19.47.jpg
     

    Dr Dong

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    23.01.2011
    Innlegg
    14.505
    Antall liker
    14.006
    Sted
    landskapet uten motstand
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Min største innsigelse mot identitetspolitikken er at det handler om å snylte på andre mennesker og hva de har gjort eller måtte lide seg i gjennom. Vi ale har jo en tilhørighet, familie, slekt, venner og annet. Norge som nasjonalstat er basert på en homogen befolkning.

    De rødgrønne søker å rasere dette med å importere titusenvis av araberkulturelle snyltere. Det må jo, og går jo, til helvete. Se til Sverige.

    Staten bør holde seg til å besørge skole, helse, infrastruktur, politi, forsvar og helsevesen. Utover det skal politikerne kunne ikke stjele folks penger for å spy dem ut over alle deres gode formål.
    Hadde du ikke lest ferdig den artikkelen du selv la ut…

    https://www.hifisentralen.no/forumet/off-topic-hja-rnet/81490-a-37.html#post2772515
     

    Asbjørn

    Rubinmedlem
    Ble medlem
    26.03.2006
    Innlegg
    39.032
    Antall liker
    40.328
    Sted
    Vingulmǫrk
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Vietnam lider den dag i dag under kommunismen. Som individ og menneske er du ikke verdt en dritt. de har fått litt styr på økonomien .. det ska de ha, men er du en vietnameser som ikke tilhører de høyere klasser så er du en trell. Jeg liker vietnamesere, de er hardhauser og nesten vikinger på en måte. Dæven så jeg gjenrne skulle byttet hundretusen araberkulturelle mot vietnamesere, eller burmesere.

    Men denne ideologien som fremelsker gruppen, fremfor mennesket og individet får min dypeste forakt. Denne identitetspolitikken kan reise til helvete.
    Kan vi leke "finne selvmotsigelsen" nå?
     

    Hardingfele

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    25.10.2014
    Innlegg
    24.295
    Antall liker
    18.694
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    For ordens skyld, Trump har altså diktet opp at NBC «er tatt for fusk».

    BF2C2C49-4772-448E-9DAE-CAA3B4C6C2C8.jpg
     

    Asbjørn

    Rubinmedlem
    Ble medlem
    26.03.2006
    Innlegg
    39.032
    Antall liker
    40.328
    Sted
    Vingulmǫrk
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Antar han mener dette intervjuet om hvorfor han sparket Comey: https://factba.se/transcript/donald-trump-interview-nbc-lester-holt-may-11-2017
    Lester Holt: Monday, you met with the Deputy Attorney General Rob Rosenstein. Did you ask for a recommendation?

    Donald Trump: What I did is, was I going to fire [James] Comey. My decision. It was not...

    Lester Holt: You had made the decision before they came over...

    Donald Trump: I... I was going to fire Comey. There is no good time to do it by the way. They...

    Lester Holt: Because in your letter you said I... I accepted... I accepted their recommendation. So, you had already made the decision.

    Donald Trump: Oh, I was going to fire regardless of recommendation.

    Lester Holt: So there [inaudible]

    Donald Trump: He made a recommendation He is highly respected. Very good guy. Very smart guy. The Democrats like him. The Republicans like him. He made a recommendation, but regardless of recommendation I was going to fire Comey, knowing there was no good time to do it. And in fact, when I decided to just do it I said to myself, I said, you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story. It's an excuse by the Democrats having lost an election that they should have won. And the reason they should have won it is, the electoral college is almost impossible for a Republican to win. Very hard. Because you start off at such a disadvantage. So, everybody was thinking they should have won the election. This was an excuse for having lost an election.
    WP mener at han prøver febrilsk å rygge unna at han har snakket seg selv inn i et glassklart tilfelle av å ha hindret etterforskningen.
    The walls are closing in. And Trump’s lawyers know it.
     
    Sist redigert:

    Hi-rex

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    06.05.2012
    Innlegg
    2.545
    Antall liker
    784
    Sted
    Etne
    Torget vurderinger
    4
    Joda, i enhver krig er det uskyldige som må lide. Men det blir enda verre om man ikke har vilje nok til å stå i mot det røde. her er konsekvensene av sosialismen i fri utfoldelse. Litt mer alvorlig enn et bilde at et gråtende barn.

    The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомо́р); (derived from морити голодом, "to kill by starvation") was a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine in 1932 and 1933 that killed millions of Ukrainians. It is also known as the Terror-Famine and Famine-Genocide in Ukraine, and sometimes referred to as the Great Famine[9] or The Ukrainian Genocide of 1932–33. It was part of the wider Soviet famine of 1932–33, which affected the major grain-producing areas of the country. During the Holodomor, millions of inhabitants of Ukraine, the majority of whom were ethnic Ukrainians, died of starvation in a peacetime catastrophe unprecedented in the history of Ukraine. Since 2006, the Holodomor has been recognized by Ukraine and 15 other countries as a genocide of the Ukrainian people carried out by the Soviet government.

    ---

    Jo Vietnamkrigen førte til lidelse og død, men det var en krig mot noe tusen ganger verre. Kommunismen og Sovjetunionens innflytelse.

    McCain gjorde sitt for å bombe kommunistene og for det skal han ha min takk, selv om han ikke var spesielt dyktig. Han skal ha for innsatsen. et anstendig menneske, litt vel konservativ for min smak, men et bra menneske som viet sitt liv til kampen mot sosialismen.

    Men et udødelig og vakkert bilde er det. Her er et annet fra samme epoke. En kommunists siste sekund.

    Vis vedlegget 506861
    Deph, for dine barn, og barnebarn skyld. Kunne det ha noget på sig med et lege sjek, der er noget her som ikke er helt ret.

    Mvh,
     

    Hardingfele

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    25.10.2014
    Innlegg
    24.295
    Antall liker
    18.694
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Trump har panikk og vurderer å sparke Sessions og Rosenstein, for å sette inn en ny justisminister som vil sparke Mueller. Dette er årsaken til at McGahn nå forlater Det hvite hus, siden han er mot at presidenten skal gjøre dette. Mens senatorene Grassley og Graham (republikanere) tidligere har advart mot å sparke Sessions er de nå kommet "på glid".

    William Rivers Pitt oppsummerer hvorfor dette ikke vil løse Trumps problemer. Vel verdt de få minuttene det tar å lese:
    https://truthout.org/articles/firing-sessions-wont-save-trump-or-his-kids-from-the-law/
     

    erato

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    15.03.2003
    Innlegg
    20.177
    Antall liker
    10.930
    Sted
    Bergen
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Morsom lesning. Gjorde dagen litt lysere. Og det står ikke en gang i MSM så da er det garantert riktig.
     
    Sist redigert:

    Bx

    Bransjeaktør
    Ble medlem
    04.08.2005
    Innlegg
    9.188
    Antall liker
    4.587
    Det blir ikke mye ryggrad igjen i det hvite hus hvis Trump blir sittende en stund...
     

    HC

    Hi-Fi freak
    Ble medlem
    02.05.2002
    Innlegg
    4.306
    Antall liker
    2.942
    Torget vurderinger
    16
    Muhammed Ali ville heller ikke verve seg til denne krigen og han kalles den største og beste bokseren gjennom tidene, akkurat som at Trump vil bli kalt den største og beste politikeren gjennom tidene.
    Ali ble fratatt VM-tittelen og dømt til fengsel fordi han åpent tok et standpunkt mot krigen. Trump på sin side slapp unna på en, etter alle solemerker, "fake" legeerklæring. Ser du forskjellen?
     

    Asbjørn

    Rubinmedlem
    Ble medlem
    26.03.2006
    Innlegg
    39.032
    Antall liker
    40.328
    Sted
    Vingulmǫrk
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Det blir ikke mye ryggrad igjen i det hvite hus hvis Trump blir sittende en stund...
    At Trump er dønn korrupt og bare tåler å omgi seg med nikkedukker visste vi jo fra start. Det enda større problemet er at kongressen mangler enhver ryggrad for å utgjøre den kontrollfunksjonen som er tillagt dem i grunnloven. Trump er nettopp den presidenten som grunnloven ble skrevet for å beskytte landet mot. Derfor er det et maktfordelingsprinsipp mellom utøvende, lovgivende og dømmende makt, og ytringsfrihet for å sikre en fri og kritisk presse. Som enhver annen wannabe diktator går Trump forutsigbart løs på alle institusjoner som bremser innfallene hans. For Trump er alt det bare et "deep state conspiracy" rettet mot ham personlig.

    I stedet for å ta sin del av ansvaret bruker spyttslikkerne hans i kongressen i stedet makten til å hindre at det utøves noen kontroll. Listen som har blitt sirkulert i det siste med skrekkeksempler på hva demokratene kan finne på å gjøre hvis de overtar kongressflertallet ser for meg ut som en liste over ting kongressen burde gransket for lenge siden, hvis de mente noe med festtalene sine om grunnlovsfestede rettigheter og ansvarsfordeling. Men det gjaldt kanskje bare da Obama var president og Hillary Clinton utenriksminister.

    https://www.axios.com/2018-midterm-...ons-180abf7b-0de8-4670-ae8a-2e6da123c584.html
    It has churned Republican stomachs. Here are some of the probes it predicts:

    President Trump’s tax returns
    Trump family businesses — and whether they comply with the Constitution's emoluments clause, including the Chinese trademark grant to the Trump Organization
    Trump's dealings with Russia, including the president's preparation for his meeting with Vladimir Putin
    The payment to Stephanie Clifford — a.k.a. Stormy Daniels
    James Comey's firing
    Trump's firing of U.S. attorneys
    Trump's proposed transgender ban for the military
    Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin's business dealings
    White House staff's personal email use
    Cabinet secretary travel, office expenses, and other misused perks
    Discussion of classified information at Mar-a-Lago
    Jared Kushner's ethics law compliance
    Dismissal of members of the EPA board of scientific counselors
    The travel ban
    Family separation policy
    Hurricane response in Puerto Rico
    Election security and hacking attempts
    White House security clearances
    Republicans Highlight Their Own Failure to Check Trump’s Corruption
    Just as the spreadsheet doubles as a catalog of Trump’s corruption, it also highlights the complicity of Republican lawmakers who have blocked Democratic attempts to investigate the president. Their failure to act on any of these fronts underscores the notion that their loyalty to Trump has superseded their loyalty to country. It’s the job of Congress to check the power of the president. House Republicans have chosen to abdicate this responsibility, as carrying it out would reflect poorly on Trump. The impact of the president’s corruption on the United States is a secondary concern.
     
    Sist redigert:

    Bx

    Bransjeaktør
    Ble medlem
    04.08.2005
    Innlegg
    9.188
    Antall liker
    4.587
    @asbjørn,

    Jepp, GOP har etterhvert utviklet en lang tradisjon i å sette seg selv foran landets beste.
     

    Hardingfele

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    25.10.2014
    Innlegg
    24.295
    Antall liker
    18.694
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    WASHINGTON — In the magnificent, lordly church-house, there were speeches and prayers. There were songs and hymns. There were bands and pipers and choirs and soloists. John McCain was given a national send-off in a National Cathedral and there was a great gathering of emotion that was almost frightening in its intensity because you knew that it was aimed at a solitary, angry, unbalanced man left back at the White House, at someone who nonetheless is the president* of the United States, with all the powers inherent to his office, a man who has created a situation in which he is an object of dislike and disrespect, because that is all that he's given to the world in return.

    It was said almost immediately after the conclusion of the funeral ceremonies on Saturday that, for a few hours anyway, we were back in a familiar country with familiar customs and manners and norms, a country with institutions built to last. That may well be true. I felt it, too. But in back of that is the realization that all of us, including the deceased, had taken those customs, manners, norms, and institutions terribly for granted. We thought they could withstand anything, even a renegade president* in the pocket of a distant authoritarian goon. We let the customs, manners, norms and institutions weaken through neglect and now we are in open conflict with an elected president and, make no mistake about it, John McCain's funeral was a council of war, and it was a council of war because that's what John McCain meant it to be.

    He deliberately made known to people that the president* was not welcome at any of the services. He deliberately chose the previous two presidents to deliver the formal eulogies. He deliberately created that scene in the Capitol rotunda at which Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, and Mike Pence, an unholy trio of Trumpist quislings, had to choke down their own cowardice and say how much they loved him and his irascibility. He deliberately created a mirror in which, if they still have an ounce of self-awareness, they could see the rot that has set in on their souls. Even at the end, John McCain knew what he was doing and he was a fearsome opponent. He wanted a pageant of everything this administration* has trashed and put up for sale, and that's what he got Saturday—a morality play shot through with Shakespearian portent and foreshadowing, a pageant of democracy's vengeance.
    Make no mistake. Those are not patriotic banalities any more. The current president* has made them dead serious again. They are no longer frothy paeans to the greatness of America. They are compass points on a battlefield. They are no longer heard with half an ear and then forgotten. They are fighting words now. The president* knew it. That's why he spent the morning rage-tweeting and the afternoon playing golf. In dying, and in carefully planning his funeral in the way he did, John McCain has opened a second front.
    https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a22893069/john-mccain-funeral-service/
     
    G

    Gjestemedlem

    Gjest
    WASHINGTON — He drove them crazy. He berated them on the way to the White House and badgered them once they got there. He stood by them when he thought they were right and tore at their heels when he was convinced they were wrong. And when it came time to depart this world, John McCain wanted them to tell his story.

    Former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, the two men who thwarted Mr. McCain’s ambitions to become commander in chief, stood one after the other before the nation’s elite at Washington National Cathedral on Saturday to honor the man they beat, extolling him as a one-of-a-kind figure the likes of which will not be seen again anytime soon.

    That they were asked, and not the current president, spoke volumes about the man and the moment. And while neither explicitly mentioned President Trump, who, uninvited and unwelcome, went golfing instead, their tributes could hardly be heard without the unspoken contrast to the current occupant of the Oval Office, a message amplified by a more overt rebuke from the senator’s daughter.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/us/politics/john-mccain-funeral.html
     
    C

    Cyber

    Gjest
    WASHINGTON — He drove them crazy. He berated them on the way to the White House and badgered them once they got there. He stood by them when he thought they were right and tore at their heels when he was convinced they were wrong. And when it came time to depart this world, John McCain wanted them to tell his story.

    Former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, the two men who thwarted Mr. McCain’s ambitions to become commander in chief, stood one after the other before the nation’s elite at Washington National Cathedral on Saturday to honor the man they beat, extolling him as a one-of-a-kind figure the likes of which will not be seen again anytime soon.

    That they were asked, and not the current president, spoke volumes about the man and the moment. And while neither explicitly mentioned President Trump, who, uninvited and unwelcome, went golfing instead, their tributes could hardly be heard without the unspoken contrast to the current occupant of the Oval Office, a message amplified by a more overt rebuke from the senator’s daughter.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/us/politics/john-mccain-funeral.html
    Ikke at jeg er Obama-frelst, men det er helt tullruskt at sittende president tok over etter Barack.


    Du kan mene hva du vil om Obama, men hans intellekt, åpenhet, karisma, evne til å treffe så utrolig rent på poengene han skaper, menneskelighet og integritet er få forunt. En statsmann som aldri jenket seg ned på nivået til enkelte motstandere. Når jeg hører mennesker støtte Trump, at han gjør mye bra for USA tenker jeg at det sier mye om personen som ytrer det.
     

    Asbjørn

    Rubinmedlem
    Ble medlem
    26.03.2006
    Innlegg
    39.032
    Antall liker
    40.328
    Sted
    Vingulmǫrk
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Unfortunately for Trump, his allies aren’t any smarter than he is
    As I and others have spent the past couple of years arguing, the character of a president determines the people who are drawn to him. If you’re honest and principled, honest and principled people will want to work for you, and if you’re dishonest and corrupt, dishonest and corrupt people will want to work for you.

    We’re seeing that play out now in courtrooms and across the federal government, as more and more of President Trump’s associates are revealed to be just like him, albeit usually on a smaller scale.

    The fact that Trump’s supporters are reflections of Trump can be seen in another way: Because Trump is petty, vindictive, obsessed with conspiracy theories and usually unable to assemble facts into a logical argument in favor of what he’s doing or would like to do, those who defend him most vigorously share all those traits and weaknesses.
    Meanwhile, with many of the president’s close associates being convicted of or pleading guilty to crimes, his legal defense is in the comically incapable hands of Rudy Giuliani, the most incompetent lawyer we’ve seen since, well, since Trump’s former “personal lawyer” Michael Cohen.

    It’s tempting to look at this extraordinary assemblage of nincompoops and conclude that Trump will inevitably receive his comeuppance for whatever misdeeds he has committed. Sadly, that is not always how the world works. If it were, Trump would never have become president in the first place.
    From Criminal Convictions to Ethical Lapses: The Range of Misconduct in Trump’s Orbit
    Telleren står vel på fem forskjellige personer fra Trump-gjengen som har erklært seg skyldig eller blitt funnet skyldig i tilsammen 20 tiltalepunkter. Så langt. Drain the Swamp, ja...
     
    Sist redigert:

    Dr Dong

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    23.01.2011
    Innlegg
    14.505
    Antall liker
    14.006
    Sted
    landskapet uten motstand
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Dommere som politiske aktører

    When the votes in contentious cases can be predicted at the outset, constitutional law simply becomes partisan politics by another name. If you typically know beforehand how justices will vote based on which president appointed them, then what’s the point of having a court that, in theory, operates above politics?
    […]
    Once upon a time, liberals looked to the Supreme Court to secure social justice, while conservatives abhorred what they called judicial activism. Now that conservatives are on the verge of locking down control of the court, they can’t wait for the court to enshrine new legal doctrine to achieve victories that have eluded them in the political branches, or, if need be, to validate successes won now that the White House and Congress are in Republican hands. Rollbacks of federal regulation of the environment, the workplace, health care and the voting booth are the constitutional grail for conservatives. Suddenly, liberals are the ones preaching judicial restraint. In the fight for the court, hypocrisy is king.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/03/...l?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
     

    Hardingfele

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    25.10.2014
    Innlegg
    24.295
    Antall liker
    18.694
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Woodward slipper nå sin bok om Trump og hans administrasjon. Verden er i de beste hender:

    White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly frequently lost his temper and told colleagues that he thought the president was “unhinged,” Woodward writes. In one small group meeting, Kelly said of Trump: “He’s an idiot. It’s pointless to try to convince him of anything. He’s gone off the rails. We’re in Crazytown. I don’t even know why any of us are here. This is the worst job I’ve ever had.”
    Dowd then explained to Mueller and Quarles why he was trying to keep the president from testifying: “I’m not going to sit there and let him look like an idiot. And you publish that transcript, because everything leaks in Washington, and the guys overseas are going to say, ‘I told you he was an idiot. I told you he was a goddamn dumbbell. What are we dealing with this idiot for?’ ”

    “John, I understand,” Mueller replied, according to Woodward.

    Later that month, Dowd told Trump: “Don’t testify. It’s either that or an orange jumpsuit.”

    But Trump, concerned about the optics of a president refusing to testify and convinced that he could handle Mueller’s questions, had by then decided otherwise.

    “I’ll be a real good witness,” Trump told Dowd, according to Woodward.

    “You are not a good witness,” Dowd replied. “Mr. President, I’m afraid I just can’t help you.”

    The next morning, Dowd resigned.
    At a National Security Council meeting on Jan. 19, Trump disregarded the significance of the massive U.S. military presence on the Korean Peninsula, including a special intelligence operation that allows the United States to detect a North Korean missile launch in seven seconds vs. 15 minutes from Alaska, according to Woodward. Trump questioned why the government was spending resources in the region at all.

    “We’re doing this in order to prevent World War III,” Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told him.

    After Trump left the meeting, Woodward recounts, “Mattis was particularly exasperated and alarmed, telling close associates that the president acted like — and had the understanding of — ‘a fifth- or sixth-grader.’ ”
    With Trump’s rage and defiance impossible to contain, Cabinet members and other senior officials learned to act discreetly. Woodward describes an alliance among Trump’s traditionalists — including Mattis and Gary Cohn, the president’s former top economic adviser — to stymie what they considered dangerous acts.

    “It felt like we were walking along the edge of the cliff perpetually,” Porter is quoted as saying. “Other times, we would fall over the edge, and an action would be taken.”

    Cohn came to regard the president as “a professional liar” and threatened to resign in August 2017 over Trump’s handling of a deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville. Cohn, who is Jewish, was especially shaken when one of his daughters found a swastika on her college dorm room.

    Trump was sharply criticized for initially saying that “both sides” were to blame. At the urging of advisers, he then condemned white supremacists and neo-Nazis, but almost immediately told aides, “That was the biggest fucking mistake I’ve made” and the “worst speech I’ve ever given,” according to Woodward’s account.

    When Cohn met with Trump to deliver his resignation letter after Charlottesville, the president told him, “This is treason,” and persuaded his economic adviser to stay on. Kelly then confided to Cohn that he shared Cohn’s horror at Trump’s handling of the tragedy — and shared Cohn’s fury with Trump.

    “I would have taken that resignation letter and shoved it up his ass six different times,” Kelly told Cohn, according to Woodward. Kelly himself has threatened to quit several times, but has not done so.
    Woodward recounts an expletive-laden altercation between Ivanka Trump, the president’s eldest daughter and senior adviser, and Stephen K. Bannon, the former chief White House strategist.

    “You’re a goddamn staffer!” Bannon screamed at her, telling her that she had to work through Priebus like other aides. “You walk around this place and act like you’re in charge, and you’re not. You’re on staff!”

    Ivanka Trump, who had special access to the president and worked around Priebus, replied: “I’m not a staffer! I’ll never be a staffer. I’m the first daughter.”

    Such tensions boiled among many of Trump’s core advisers. Priebus is quoted as describing Trump officials not as rivals but as “natural predators.”

    “When you put a snake and a rat and a falcon and a rabbit and a shark and a seal in a zoo without walls, things start getting nasty and bloody,” Priebus says.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2116c2e8a15e
     

    Dr Dong

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    23.01.2011
    Innlegg
    14.505
    Antall liker
    14.006
    Sted
    landskapet uten motstand
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Ingen anser Kelly som et gresskar; men han må vel være større idiot enn Trumpen; sistnevnte har vel en idé om hvorfor han er der, førstnevnte vet ikke engang hvorfor han er der, men forblir. Triste tilstander, det skal være visst.
     

    Dr Dong

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    23.01.2011
    Innlegg
    14.505
    Antall liker
    14.006
    Sted
    landskapet uten motstand
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Dommere som politiske aktører

    When the votes in contentious cases can be predicted at the outset, constitutional law simply becomes partisan politics by another name. If you typically know beforehand how justices will vote based on which president appointed them, then what’s the point of having a court that, in theory, operates above politics?
    […]
    Once upon a time, liberals looked to the Supreme Court to secure social justice, while conservatives abhorred what they called judicial activism. Now that conservatives are on the verge of locking down control of the court, they can’t wait for the court to enshrine new legal doctrine to achieve victories that have eluded them in the political branches, or, if need be, to validate successes won now that the White House and Congress are in Republican hands. Rollbacks of federal regulation of the environment, the workplace, health care and the voting booth are the constitutional grail for conservatives. Suddenly, liberals are the ones preaching judicial restraint. In the fight for the court, hypocrisy is king.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/03/...l?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
    I forlengelsen av dette

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/politics/trump-federal-judges/?utm_term=.3c601535a1c3

    For å si det på den måten; her er ikke bare én stygg faen; det trengs to for en tango. For et sjukt system.
     

    Asbjørn

    Rubinmedlem
    Ble medlem
    26.03.2006
    Innlegg
    39.032
    Antall liker
    40.328
    Sted
    Vingulmǫrk
    Torget vurderinger
    2
    Historiene Woodward gjenforteller fra Trump-administrasjonen er rett ut av dårekisten. Trump burde vært avsatt, innlagt og satt inn, ikke nødvendigvis i den rekkefølgen. Ikke rart at Trump allerede for noen dager siden begynte å rakke ned på Woodward, muligens USAs mest respekterte nålevende journalist. Og fortsatt er det noen som greier å se en «sterk leder» i tilfellet Trump. :rolleyes:

    Transkript av telefonsamtale mellom Trump og Woodward:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ween-president-trump-journalist-bob-woodward/

    You cannot fucking make this shit up.
     
    J

    Jim I Hendriksen 2nd Edt.

    Gjest
    ^Ja nå er`n sur ser jeg....

    «Mattis var spesielt opprørt og urolig og fortalte nærstående at presidenten oppført seg som, og hadde forståelsen til, en femte- eller sjetteklassing».

    Slik beskriver Bob Woodward, prisbelønt journalist som blant annet gravde fram Richard Nixons rolle i Watergate-skandalen, forsvarsminister James Mattis' reaksjon etter et møte i det nasjonale sikkerhetsrådet i januar i år.

    https://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/trump-raser-mot-ny-bok---oppdiktet-svindel/70174022
     

    erato

    Æresmedlem
    Ble medlem
    15.03.2003
    Innlegg
    20.177
    Antall liker
    10.930
    Sted
    Bergen
    Torget vurderinger
    1
    Det er bare en ting å gjøre med sånt, avvise det som fake news.
     
    Status
    Stengt for ytterligere svar.
  • Laster inn…

Diskusjonstråd Se tråd i gallerivisning

  • Laster inn…
Topp Bunn