Nuvel, Charles MacLean har sånn ca 30 års erfaring med dette så han er nok ikke helt på feil jorde.atonal skrev:Tja, når en anmelder omtaler en Islay malt for "symaskinolje" så sier det mer (mye) om anmelderen enn om malten.
Ikke noe å bekymre seg over, m.a.o. ;D
![](http://www.royalmilewhiskies.com/images/products/1000000000262_L.jpg)
Laddien (BRUICHLADDICH X4 +3 ) som var med i testen er kjent for å være en høyst diskutabel smak.
Royal Mile Whisky sin Staff Tasting Notes sier kanskje litt om hva de hadde å bryne seg på:
Staff Tasting Notes:
Nose: Ehmm... we struggled to find any positives. A suspiciously damp mattress. Rotten Fruit and marshmallows. Phenolic meths.
Palate:MEDIC! Ashy, feint smoke influence, salty and dry. So intensely spirity and much too hot.
Finish: Had us reaching for something else with urgency.
Water: Undeveloped spirit, more meths and no notes of maturation at all.
Comments: Bruichladdich themselves courted press coverage over the issue that some felt a spirit of this strength should be made illegal. For once, we found ourselves agreeing with the nanny state. This spirit needs to go away and have a long hard look at itself for at least another 8-10 years.